From the Labor Department file
What is on record for Apple Health Care
- Name on the record
- Apple Health Care
- Also recorded as
- Brightview Nursing Center, Ledgecrest Health Care Center, Rose Haven, Ridgeview Health Care Center
- Location on the record
- Meriden, Avon, Berlin, Connecticut
- County
- New Haven County
- Industry
- Nursing Care Facilities
- Cases
- 20 closed, 16 with a violation found, 4 with none
- Back wages agreed to pay
- $7,646
- Workers due back wages
- 99
- Civil money penalties assessed
- $5,445
- Violations recorded
- 99
- First and latest case
- 2004 to 2009
- Repeat or willful flags
- 16 flagged repeat
Every investigation
Every case on the record, newest first
| Investigation | Laws | Violations | Back wages | Workers | Penalties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 2007 to November 2009 | none recorded | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| April 2005 to April 2007 | none recorded | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| November 2004 to June 2005 | none recorded | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| November 2004 to June 2005 | none recorded | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 11 | $784 | 11 | $605 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 8 | $754 | 8 | $440 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 7 | $531 | 7 | $385 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 2 | $147 | 2 | $110 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 3 | $453 | 3 | $165 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 6 | $305 | 6 | $330 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 4 | $198 | 4 | $220 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 6 | $655 | 6 | $330 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 6 | $554 | 6 | $330 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 7 | $435 | 7 | $385 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 4 | $331 | 4 | $220 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 3 | $75 | 3 | $165 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 7 | $407 | 7 | $385 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 10 | $369 | 10 | $550 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 10 | $1,059 | 10 | $550 |
| July 2002 to May 2004 | FLSA, overtime repeat | 5 | $589 | 5 | $275 |
Investigation dates are the findings period the Department recorded, newest first. A zero is a zero in the file: a case can find a violation and agree no back wages.
By law
Laws involved and what each case found
- Fair Labor Standards Act: 16 cases, $7,646 in back wages, $5,445 in penalties
- FLSA overtime: 16 cases, $7,646 in back wages
Plain words
What this record means and what it does not
The Wage and Hour Division enforces the federal minimum wage, overtime, child labor, family leave and the wage rules on federal contracts and visa programs. Each row above is one investigation the Division closed; of the 20 on this record, 16 ended with a violation found and 4 with none.
Back wages agreed is the amount the employer agreed to pay the workers the Division found were owed, computed at the federal rates: a minimum wage of $7.25 an hour and overtime after 40 hours in a week. Where Connecticut has a higher state or local minimum, the same hours would come to more under state law, and that part is not in this file.
Civil money penalties are amounts the Division assessed against the employer, separate from back wages; the file records the assessment, not what was finally paid.
The Department flagged 16 cases on this record as a repeat violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, which raises the penalties it may assess.
This record is federal only. It does not include claims filed with the state labor office, private lawsuits or settlements, so an employer absent from it is not an employer with a clean record, and an employer on it has not been found guilty of anything by a court. Names are written as the Department recorded them, so one business can appear under more than one legal name, and a franchise or branch can sit under its own.
If you are owed wages
Where to file a wage claim in Connecticut
In Connecticut a wage claim can go to the state: Wage & Workplace Standards Complaint Forms Instructions takes claims under state law, which often covers more than the federal rules. The federal route is the Division's page on how to file a complaint with the Wage and Hour Division with what to send and where. The Division also keeps a search of back wages owed to workers it collected and could not deliver.
Around this employer
Nearby employers and related pages
Other employers on the record in Meriden, by back wages:
| Employer | Cases | Back wages | Workers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lasership, INC | 1 | $304,000 | 121 |
| Nunez Trucking Company, LLC | 2 | $84,366 | 7 |
| Cannon Trucking, LLC | 1 | $20,000 | 2 |
| RVM Trucking, LLC. | 1 | $17,357 | 6 |
| Kuhn Employment Opportunities | 2 | $15,285 | 106 |
| Whitney Assoc., Inc. | 1 | $13,147 | 2 |
| Vipro LLC | 1 | $12,399 | 2 |
| ARC of Meridan -Wallingford, Inc. | 1 | $10,691 | 73 |
| Pavement Maintenance Services, LLC | 2 | $4,161 | 20 |
| Tuxis Ohr's Fuel, Inc. | 2 | $484 | 5 |
The same name on the record in other states:
Related pages:
Sources
Where this record comes from
The record comes from the Wage and Hour Division compliance action data published by the U.S. Department of Labor, every concluded investigation since fiscal 2005, snapshot dated April 22, 2026 and read for this page on November 5, 2026. The Wage and Hour Division is the office that made the findings. Figures are printed as the file carries them, a zero included; an investigation with no end date is shown by its start; the county is the one the Census Bureau puts the employer's ZIP code in.
Disclaimer. The wage and hour information here is for general information only. It comes from the Labor Department's closed case file as the Department publishes it, which can be incomplete, outdated or wrong, and a case on this record is not a court judgment and not an admission by the employer. Check with the Wage and Hour Division before you rely on it. PublicRecordCenter.com assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this information.